On 12-13 November UNU will be hosting a 2 day research workshop on “Understanding and Communicating Risks Post-Fukushima” as part of their ongoing research on the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident. I will be contributing to the workshop in my capacity as a Visiting Research Fellow at UNU. I will be presenting some opening thoughts in the introductory session and also chairing the closing session. Unfortunately this is a closed event due to space constraints. Following the workshop, however, on the afternoon of Friday 13 November UNU will be hosting a public event with a number of the workshop participants. For more information about the public seminar, please check here.
This weekend I am looking forward to returning to the London School of Economics, where I will be attending and presenting at the 2015 Millennium conference. This year the theme for the conference is the very intriguing topic of ‘failure and denial in world politics’. I will be taking this opportunity to present the first substantive piece of work on a new project I am currently developing. I will be part of the ‘The Mend of IR Theory? Thinking through Failure and Denial’ panel, which is being held from 14:30 – 16:00 on Saturday. I have enjoyed the previous Millennium conferences I participated in, especially the 2008 edition on ‘Interrogating Democracy in International Relations’, which was very closely related to my research interests. My paper from that year was subsequently published as part of the journal’s special issue on the topic, which is available to read here. For more information about this year’s conference, including the programme, please visit their website.
I am very happy to announce the publication of my first single authored monograph, The Rise of Democracy. This book pulls together and considerably develops some of the themes I had previously explored in a series of articles and chapters looking at the different ways that democracy intersects with international relations. The aim of the book is to re-examine democracy’s past as a step towards better understanding its contemporary standing and what its future might entail. The historical study in turn forms the basis of a minimal but robust defence of democracy, grounded in its limits and fragility. I feel this book goes considerably further than my previously published work on the topic and I am very pleased with the outcome. It is published by Edinburgh University Press, who have been fantastic to work with. I am deeply appreciative of their help and patience in seeing it through to publication.
For more information, please see:
- Distributed in the UK / Europe: Edinburgh University Press
- Promotion discount (valid until 30/11/15): 6JG
- Distributed in Australia / NZ by NewSouth Books
- Promotional discount (valid until 30/11/15): DEMOCRACY15
- Distributed in North America by Oxford University Press
I have recently published a new op-ed in The Japan Times, which builds on my previous commentary about the policies and approach of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. In my latest piece I argue that it is necessary to appreciate that regardless of the possible motives of Abe and his LDP government, they are responding to genuine policy questions facing Japan. In the case of the security reforms, the rise of China and America’s potential decline are significant issues Japan has to deal with. And for nuclear restarts, the challenge posed by climate change means there are legitimate arguments for low carbon options like nuclear. For those opposed to Abe, the challenge is not simply to reject his policies, but think through what realistic answers to these difficult questions may be.
Following on from my new Japan Times opinion piece, I was briefly interview on Monocle internet radio about the prime ministership of Shinzo Abe and the direction he is taking Japan. If you would like to hear the interview, the show can be downloaded here or streamed here. My segment starts at the 16 minute mark and goes for about 5 minutes. Thanks to Monocle for the invitation.
I have a new op-ed in The Japan Times today. It provides a commentary of the recent attempts by Abe and the LDP to push through security bills that would effectively undermine Article 9 of the Japanese constitution. I suggest that the manner and style in which Abe has pursued these changes has been deeply problematic, more so than the actual reforms that have been proposed. Given that Abe has been in a comparatively very strong opposition, both internally within the LDP and vis-a-vis the opposition, he has missed a golden opportunity to address the long-term problems Japan is facing, choosing to instead prioritising changing the constitution.
Next week I have been invited to give a lecture at the Japan campus of Lakeland College, which is located in Shinjuku. I will be offering some thoughts on the rise of the Islamic State and seeking to place the threat in perspective. Details below. All welcome.
Coming to Terms with the Islamic State: The View from Japan Wednesday 8 July, 7PM at Lakeland College Japan
In a remarkably short time the Islamic State (IS) has emerged from the turmoil and instability of Syria and Iraq, distinguishing itself through horrific acts of violence and remarkable successes on the battlefield. Human rights abuses such as mass executions of innocent people, intentional attempts to inflame sectarian tensions, and widespread sexual violence have quickly identified IS as a brutal and ruthless actor. In Japan interest in IS has grown following the executions of Haruna Yukawa and Kenji Goto. One year has now passed since IS proclaimed the establishment of a new caliphate, but the international community still remains at a loss over what to do. In this context, the purpose of this talk is to reflect on how great a threat IS poses, considering how unique or new a problem it represents, and how outside actors – including Japan – should respond.
I’ve got a new piece online over at The Diplomat, which reflects on the limited attention paid to the Fukushima nuclear accident at the Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction recently held in Sendai. I argue that this was a missed chance to further incorporate the danger posed by ‘na-tech’ (natural – technological) disasters into disaster risk reduction strategies. Understandably the Fukushima accident has focused our attention on the risk posed by nuclear power plants, but its lessons have much wider applicability.
On Monday I’ll be giving a presentation as part of a UNU side event at the Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction in Sendai. For full details about the event, please visit here. For the event, I’ve prepared a new working paper, which can be downloaded here. The abstract is below
Update: if you want the short version, I’ve also added the powerpoint slides from my presentation: Sendai presentation 16.3.15
This paper focuses on the lessons that can be learned from the nuclear accident at the Fukushima Daiichi plant following the massive earthquake and tsunami that struck Japan on 11 March 2011. There has been a strong path dependency with the Fukushima disaster, with decisions made during the initial response period having a determinative impact on the subsequent recovery process. It is suggested that more focus needs to be placed on the social dimensions of the recovery process, such as rebuilding trust and restoring a sense of security and wellbeing for affected people. It is particularly important that lessons are taken from the Fukushima nuclear accident because the combination of aging infrastructure interacting with a natural hazard to trigger a technological disaster is a scenario that is likely to become increasingly common in the future.
I have a new op-ed in The Japan Times today. It considers to what extent the Islamic State and terrorism pose a threat to the security of Japan and its citizens. The argument I present is pretty sensible and obvious, noting the very limited threat terrorism represents and the need to be wary of politicians stoking fears for their own ends. Japan has thankfully been spared the worst excesses of America’s ‘war on terror’ and we should try to make sure it does not repeat the same mistakes.